<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s time for another Good Idea/Bad Idea</title>
	<atom:link href="http://meljeanbrook.com/blog/archives/1995/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://meljeanbrook.com/blog/archives/1995?utm_source=rss&#038;utm_medium=rss&#038;utm_campaign=its-time-for-another-good-ideabad-idea</link>
	<description>The home of the Guardians erotic urban fantasy romance series and the Iron Seas steampunk romance series.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 04:26:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bree</title>
		<link>http://meljeanbrook.com/blog/archives/1995#comment-45046</link>
		<dc:creator>Bree</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 21:19:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meljeanbrook.com/?p=1995#comment-45046</guid>
		<description>That was one of my biggest head-desking moments this week.  Whoever left the comment did Samantha no favors. If it was a reader, they made the author look like a tacky sneak.  If it was a promo company, ditto. I just am going to hope like hell it WAS one of those two options, because the third makes me oh-so-sad.

Also. Authors? A surprising number of people know what IP addresses are and how to track them. Even if you think you&#039;re tricky. If Shannon wanted to know for sure...she could find out. 

Don&#039;t be dumb, authors. Please.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was one of my biggest head-desking moments this week.  Whoever left the comment did Samantha no favors. If it was a reader, they made the author look like a tacky sneak.  If it was a promo company, ditto. I just am going to hope like hell it WAS one of those two options, because the third makes me oh-so-sad.</p>
<p>Also. Authors? A surprising number of people know what IP addresses are and how to track them. Even if you think you&#8217;re tricky. If Shannon wanted to know for sure&#8230;she could find out. </p>
<p>Don&#8217;t be dumb, authors. Please.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon C.</title>
		<link>http://meljeanbrook.com/blog/archives/1995#comment-45044</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon C.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 May 2009 07:32:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meljeanbrook.com/?p=1995#comment-45044</guid>
		<description>Oh, Meljean, I &lt;3 you so much right now for this. I was trying to figure out the best way to handle that comment. Possibly I&#039;ll just link to your post and call it good. Oh, well, she was at least good for a laugh.


Also, I like to think I&#039;m approachable about that sort of thing anyway. I mean, there is a perfectly good contact form the author could have used instead of commenting on a four-day-old post and it wouldn&#039;t have been so asshatted. Then again, I live on planet Earth, and Earth logic eludes some people. :
P
It also never occurred to me to edit the comment itself. Must. Resist. Tempation. The edit feature should be used for good, not evil.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, Meljean, I &lt;3 you so much right now for this. I was trying to figure out the best way to handle that comment. Possibly I&#8217;ll just link to your post and call it good. Oh, well, she was at least good for a laugh.</p>
<p>Also, I like to think I&#8217;m approachable about that sort of thing anyway. I mean, there is a perfectly good contact form the author could have used instead of commenting on a four-day-old post and it wouldn&#8217;t have been so asshatted. Then again, I live on planet Earth, and Earth logic eludes some people. :<br />
P<br />
It also never occurred to me to edit the comment itself. Must. Resist. Tempation. The edit feature should be used for good, not evil.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meljean</title>
		<link>http://meljeanbrook.com/blog/archives/1995#comment-45042</link>
		<dc:creator>meljean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 18:38:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meljeanbrook.com/?p=1995#comment-45042</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-45041&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jackie M (Literary Escapism)&lt;/a&gt;: Well, on my end, I&#039;m just glad you didn&#039;t hate the book. Not because that would mean that you&#039;d write a review that was &quot;OMG, this book suxxors!&quot; (Of which I&#039;d had plenty, lol) but just the general Yay! that you didn&#039;t end up slogging through a book you didn&#039;t enjoy. 

When I look back at Demon Angel, I do see quite a few things that I might have done differently, structure-wise, so that the plot starts earlier. (Actually, I did originally start in Part II so that the main plot started right away, then realized that all of the history between them was needed to explain how they reacted to each other -- and, I thought, the romance. I waffled for a long time about how to structure it, and went for chronological just because it was the most straightforward (in a book that was already convoluted enough)).  Now, I think I might have handled it a little differently, in that the story is exactly what I wanted to tell, but I might have told it in a slightly different way. 

Er, not that I don&#039;t love the book; I do. But that after putting a few more books under my belt, I can see where a few structural changes might have made a huge difference in the pacing, and the content itself not alter much.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-45041" rel="nofollow">Jackie M (Literary Escapism)</a>: Well, on my end, I&#8217;m just glad you didn&#8217;t hate the book. Not because that would mean that you&#8217;d write a review that was &#8220;OMG, this book suxxors!&#8221; (Of which I&#8217;d had plenty, lol) but just the general Yay! that you didn&#8217;t end up slogging through a book you didn&#8217;t enjoy. </p>
<p>When I look back at Demon Angel, I do see quite a few things that I might have done differently, structure-wise, so that the plot starts earlier. (Actually, I did originally start in Part II so that the main plot started right away, then realized that all of the history between them was needed to explain how they reacted to each other &#8212; and, I thought, the romance. I waffled for a long time about how to structure it, and went for chronological just because it was the most straightforward (in a book that was already convoluted enough)).  Now, I think I might have handled it a little differently, in that the story is exactly what I wanted to tell, but I might have told it in a slightly different way. </p>
<p>Er, not that I don&#8217;t love the book; I do. But that after putting a few more books under my belt, I can see where a few structural changes might have made a huge difference in the pacing, and the content itself not alter much.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie M (Literary Escapism)</title>
		<link>http://meljeanbrook.com/blog/archives/1995#comment-45041</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie M (Literary Escapism)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 17:44:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meljeanbrook.com/?p=1995#comment-45041</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t mind self-promo as long as the person is honest about it.  Talking about your book (you might really enjoy my book, etc etc) doesn&#039;t bother me at all; but it&#039;s like you said, if you&#039;re going to promo it, don&#039;t pretend to be someone else.

She&#039;s actually not the first one to do it at Literary Escapism, but she is the first author I&#039;ve seen.  I&#039;ve had a lot of hte &quot;play roulette or poker&quot; sites stop by and leave comments on books with their names as links to something.  I don&#039;t like those and end up deleting them (or just deleting the promotion part).  So I may just do that.

AND...I&#039;m glad you liked the review.  I kept having to rewrite it because it kept sounding like a negative review and that&#039;s not what I wanted since that wouldn&#039;t be correct.  :)  I feel better about it now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t mind self-promo as long as the person is honest about it.  Talking about your book (you might really enjoy my book, etc etc) doesn&#8217;t bother me at all; but it&#8217;s like you said, if you&#8217;re going to promo it, don&#8217;t pretend to be someone else.</p>
<p>She&#8217;s actually not the first one to do it at Literary Escapism, but she is the first author I&#8217;ve seen.  I&#8217;ve had a lot of hte &#8220;play roulette or poker&#8221; sites stop by and leave comments on books with their names as links to something.  I don&#8217;t like those and end up deleting them (or just deleting the promotion part).  So I may just do that.</p>
<p>AND&#8230;I&#8217;m glad you liked the review.  I kept having to rewrite it because it kept sounding like a negative review and that&#8217;s not what I wanted since that wouldn&#8217;t be correct.  <img src='http://meljeanbrook.com/blog1/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   I feel better about it now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meljean</title>
		<link>http://meljeanbrook.com/blog/archives/1995#comment-45040</link>
		<dc:creator>meljean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 17:22:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meljeanbrook.com/?p=1995#comment-45040</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-45038&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jackie M (Literary Escapism)&lt;/a&gt;: I should add -- it&#039;s not the promo that irritates me (although there are better ways to go about it.) It&#039;s the assumption that everyone reading the blog is too dumb to figure out that it *is* self-promo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-45038" rel="nofollow">Jackie M (Literary Escapism)</a>: I should add &#8212; it&#8217;s not the promo that irritates me (although there are better ways to go about it.) It&#8217;s the assumption that everyone reading the blog is too dumb to figure out that it *is* self-promo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meljean</title>
		<link>http://meljeanbrook.com/blog/archives/1995#comment-45039</link>
		<dc:creator>meljean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 17:20:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meljeanbrook.com/?p=1995#comment-45039</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-45038&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jackie M (Literary Escapism)&lt;/a&gt;: I&#039;m never sure what the right response is. I had one about month ago here that I just left, because I figure that if she&#039;s going to show her ass, I don&#039;t mind letting her. 

On the other hand ... it *is* irritating when someone uses your site to promo their work like that. Irritating and rude. 

So when they show up here, a part of me wants to just delete the comments. The other part of me is quite happy to allow them to stay and make an ass of themselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-45038" rel="nofollow">Jackie M (Literary Escapism)</a>: I&#8217;m never sure what the right response is. I had one about month ago here that I just left, because I figure that if she&#8217;s going to show her ass, I don&#8217;t mind letting her. </p>
<p>On the other hand &#8230; it *is* irritating when someone uses your site to promo their work like that. Irritating and rude. </p>
<p>So when they show up here, a part of me wants to just delete the comments. The other part of me is quite happy to allow them to stay and make an ass of themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie M (Literary Escapism)</title>
		<link>http://meljeanbrook.com/blog/archives/1995#comment-45038</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie M (Literary Escapism)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 17:17:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meljeanbrook.com/?p=1995#comment-45038</guid>
		<description>Is it bad that I was confused when I saw the comment?  My first thought was &quot;okay, this reader really likes this author&quot;; now I know better.  There are times I am such a newbie at this whole review thing.  

Now the question is....do I delete it or change the name to be correct and get rid of the promo?  Would it be wrong if I did that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it bad that I was confused when I saw the comment?  My first thought was &#8220;okay, this reader really likes this author&#8221;; now I know better.  There are times I am such a newbie at this whole review thing.  </p>
<p>Now the question is&#8230;.do I delete it or change the name to be correct and get rid of the promo?  Would it be wrong if I did that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carolyn Jewel</title>
		<link>http://meljeanbrook.com/blog/archives/1995#comment-45036</link>
		<dc:creator>Carolyn Jewel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 14:45:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meljeanbrook.com/?p=1995#comment-45036</guid>
		<description>Two of those numbnuts did that at my blog. Yuck! They both wrote for the same POD publishers. I deleted their um, backsides.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two of those numbnuts did that at my blog. Yuck! They both wrote for the same POD publishers. I deleted their um, backsides.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: blodeuedd</title>
		<link>http://meljeanbrook.com/blog/archives/1995#comment-45031</link>
		<dc:creator>blodeuedd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 06:30:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meljeanbrook.com/?p=1995#comment-45031</guid>
		<description>Tsk, not liking that at all...then again, they do wanna spread the word about their books, in any form</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tsk, not liking that at all&#8230;then again, they do wanna spread the word about their books, in any form</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meljean</title>
		<link>http://meljeanbrook.com/blog/archives/1995#comment-45030</link>
		<dc:creator>meljean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 05:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meljeanbrook.com/?p=1995#comment-45030</guid>
		<description>@&lt;a href=&quot;#comment-45029&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Jackie B&lt;/a&gt;: to be fair, it might not be the author herself. I&#039;ve heard that promo companies do this kind of thing, too. It could be that she&#039;s hired someone to stir up buzz around the blogs, and not quite realize how they intended to do it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@<a href="#comment-45029" rel="nofollow">Jackie B</a>: to be fair, it might not be the author herself. I&#8217;ve heard that promo companies do this kind of thing, too. It could be that she&#8217;s hired someone to stir up buzz around the blogs, and not quite realize how they intended to do it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

